Coaching: A Proactive Approach to Youth Mental Health

The conversation around young people's mental health is growing louder, and for good reason. The challenges facing today's youth are complex, and the statistics reveal a pressing need for effective support systems. While access to clinical care is crucial, a reactive approach alone isn't enough. We must shift our focus towards proactive, preventative strategies that equip young people with the tools they need to navigate life's difficulties.

Coaching offers a powerful way to build this essential foundation of resilience and wellbeing. But if you've looked for it in official school guidance, the evidence hubs, the recognised intervention lists, the frameworks schools are pointed toward, you'll struggle to find it named. That's not because it doesn't work. It's because of where it sits, structurally, in a system that hasn't yet been built to recognise it.

This article explores the current landscape of youth mental health in the UK, makes the case for early prevention, and, for the first time in this conversation, looks honestly at why coaching, despite a growing evidence base, still isn't showing up where schools go looking for targeted support.

The State of Youth Mental Health in the UK

Recent data highlights a significant challenge for youth mental health services in the UK. The demand for support is high, and the system is struggling to keep up, leaving many young people without the timely help they need.

Statistics from 2023 show that approximately one in five children and young people aged 8 to 25 have a probable mental disorder. Referrals to Children and Young People's Mental Health Services (CYPMHS) have soared, but access remains a major hurdle.

During 2022-23, around 949,200 children and young people had active referrals in England. Of those, about 39% had their referrals closed before they even received a second contact, indicating a significant gap between need and provision.

How Poor Mental Health Impacts Young People

When mental health challenges go unaddressed, they can have a profound impact on a young person's life. The effects are not confined to their emotional state; they ripple outwards, touching every aspect of their development.

• Academic Performance: Issues like anxiety and depression can make it difficult for students to concentrate, engage in learning, and complete their work. This can lead to a decline in grades, reduced attendance, and a diminished interest in school, ultimately affecting their future educational and career opportunities.
• Social Relationships: Mental health problems can cause young people to withdraw from friends and family, leading to feelings of isolation and loneliness. They may struggle to form and maintain the positive relationships that are vital for healthy development.
• Overall Wellbeing: The burden of a mental health disorder can affect a young person's ability to cope with daily life, engage in hobbies, and plan for the future. It is linked to an increase in risky behaviours and can establish patterns that continue into adulthood.
• Trauma, Adverse Childhood Experiences and Disadvantage: Mental health difficulties rarely arise in isolation. Trauma, adverse childhood experiences, and disadvantage such as poverty or family instability all raise the risk of poor mental health, often compounding one another. Looked-after children, young carers, and those facing multiple, overlapping disadvantages are especially vulnerable and rarely well served by a one-size-fits-all approach, which is exactly why early, targeted support matters: it reaches young people before difficulties become entrenched.

Why We Need a More Proactive Approach to Youth Mental Health

The current system is heavily reliant on clinical, medicalised interventions that are often only available when a young person is already in crisis. While essential, this reactive model misses a crucial opportunity to prevent problems from escalating in the first place.

Government and sector guidance already recognises this. Schools are encouraged to think in terms of three tiers of support: universal provision available to every student (a calm, inclusive environment, PSHE, enrichment), specialist provision for the most complex or severe needs (CAMHS, Mental Health Support Teams, therapeutic inclusion bases), and, in between, targeted support: early, preventative help for individuals or groups showing signs of difficulty, before things reach crisis point.

That middle tier is exactly where a proactive, resilience-building approach belongs. And it's exactly where coaching, conceptually, fits. A proactive approach focuses on building protective factors through targtedted support, with resilience at its core. Resilience is the ability to adapt and bounce back from adversity, stress, and challenges. It doesn't mean a young person will never face difficulties, but it does mean they will have the inner resources to cope with them effectively. By fostering resilience, we empower young people to manage their emotions, solve problems, and maintain a positive outlook, reducing the likelihood that they will need intensive mental health support later on.

So Why Isn't Coaching Named as Targeted Support?

Here's the honest part of the story. If coaching is such a good fit for this middle tier, why do the DfE's targeted support hub, NICE's evidence reviews, and most school inspection frameworks not name it as a recognised option for supporting young people's mental health?

The answer isn't that coaching has been tried and found wanting. It's that the infrastructure schools use to select, fund and defend targeted support was built around a different shape of intervention entirely, and coaching hasn't yet been slotted into it.

• ‍The evidence pipeline expects a different format. The evidence reviews schools are pointed toward (NICE's guideline NG223 among them) are built to screen for RCTs and structured comparative trials of manualised interventions: things with a fixed curriculum, session count, and delivery script. Out of over 47,000 references screened for one such review, only 15 studies made the cut, and every single one was either a staff-delivered manualised programme or a specialist-delivered clinical intervention. Coaching, as a relational and adaptive process, doesn't submit itself neatly to that kind of screen, not because the underlying research doesn't exist, but because it hasn't been packaged in the format the pipeline is built to recognise.‍
• "Suitably trained" has no obvious answer. Guidance requires targeted support to be delivered by suitably trained individuals, with credentials school leaders can point to. Counselling has BACP. CBT has accredited therapist bodies. Coaching does have accrediting bodies, but they have historically been built around executive and workplace coaching, not the more nuanced skillset needed to coach young people. That leaves a gap: there hasn't been a single, recognised accreditation route specifically for coaching children and young people, which understandably makes a safeguarding-conscious leadership team cautious.‍
• The "Coaching" word is already taken. In much of the sector's own guidance on inclusion and pastoral provision, "coaching" already means something specific: staff coaching other staff, as professional development. That existing meaning makes it harder for pupil-facing coaching to register as its own distinct category, rather than being read as a synonym for mentoring.‍
• Catalogues list programmes, not approaches. Evidence hubs school leaders use to help identify support are built to list discrete, branded interventions with a fixed manual. Coaching is a skillset and a relationship, delivered differently by every practitioner and pupil pair, genuinely harder to catalogue, even where the training behind it is structured and consistent.

None of this means coaching's evidence base is thin. It means the evidence exists in a different shape than the current system is built to search for. Coaching in educational settings has been studied for close to twenty years now, with research spanning the UK, Australia and the USA, published in peer-reviewed journals including the International Coaching Psychology Review and The Coaching Psychologist. The foundational studies in this field date back to the early 2000s, and a 2025 systematic review drawing on research from 2003 to 2023 found consistent benefits across academic performance, retention, executive functioning, self-regulation and wellbeing.

A landmark UK study (Robson-Kelly & van Nieuwerburgh, 2016) followed young people at risk of developing mental health problems through a coaching programme and found it built accountability, awareness, and, crucially, increased choice and control over thoughts, feelings and behaviour. More recent research (2025 to 2026) has extended these findings with quantitative outcome data, showing large effects on goal attainment and meaningful gains in resilience, self-insight and reduced psychological distress. The pattern is consistent across two decades of research, spanning multiple countries and educational settings: coaching's clearest, most reliably replicated effects are on exactly the psychosocial outcomes, hope, resilience, self-regulation, wellbeing, confidence, that early intervention is meant to build.

How Coaching Develops Resilience and Wellbeing

Coaching is a collaborative, goal-oriented process that is uniquely suited to building resilience and wellbeing in young people. Unlike therapy, which often explores the past to understand present issues, coaching is forward-looking. It helps young people identify their strengths, set meaningful goals, and create actionable plans to achieve them. This process empowers them to become active agents in their own development.

Building Essential Life Skills

Through coaching, young people develop a toolkit of essential skills that serve them throughout their lives:

• Increased Self-Awareness: Coaches use powerful questioning techniques to help young people understand their own thoughts, feelings, and behaviours. This self-awareness is the first step towards managing emotional responses and making conscious choices.
• Improved Problem-Solving: Coaching sessions provide a structured space for young people to break down challenges into manageable steps. They learn to identify obstacles, brainstorm solutions, and take initiative, building confidence in their ability to handle difficulties.
• Greater Emotional Regulation: A coach can help a young person recognise their emotional triggers and develop strategies for managing them. This might include mindfulness techniques, positive self-talk, or reframing negative thoughts, which are all key components of resilience.
• Enhanced Confidence and Self-Efficacy: By setting and achieving small, incremental goals, young people experience success. This builds self-confidence and the belief in their own ability to effect change in their lives, a concept known as self-efficacy.
• Stronger Relationships: Coaching can improve communication skills, helping young people express themselves more clearly and build more positive, supportive relationships with peers, teachers, and family members.

Increasing Capacity for Early Prevention in Schools or Settings

One of the greatest challenges for schools and youth settings is capacity. Staff are often stretched thin, and they may not feel equipped to handle the growing mental health needs of the young people they support. This is where training staff in coaching skills becomes a game changer.

By training teachers, youth workers, and support staff to become coaches, organisations can create an in-house, sustainable culture of early prevention. This approach increases an organisation's capacity to support its young people without having to rely solely on external services, and it addresses the gap described above directly: it gives schools a named, trained group of staff delivering a defined offer, sitting between universal provision and specialist referral, with credentials attached to the people delivering it.

When staff members are trained as coaches, they can:

• Identify Early Warning Signs: Trained staff are better able to recognise subtle changes in a young person's behaviour or mood that may indicate they are struggling.
• Provide Immediate, Low-Level Support: Instead of immediately referring a student to an overburdened external service, a staff coach can offer one-to-one support. They can help the young person develop coping strategies and work through challenges before they escalate.
• Foster a More Supportive Environment: A coaching culture promotes open communication and trusting relationships. When young people know there are trained and trusted adults they can turn to, they are more likely to seek help early.
• Reduce Staff Workload and Stress: Equipping staff with effective coaching strategies can reduce their stress. They feel more confident and capable in supporting students, and by empowering students to solve their own problems, they can lessen the dependency on staff for constant intervention.

The Gap Is Closing

Coaching's absence from official targeted support catalogues isn't a verdict on whether it works. It's a description of a system that hasn't noticed or caught up to two decades of coaching psychology evidence. The pieces needed to close that gap, recognised accreditation, a defined and trained workforce, built-in outcome measurement, and clear positioning as the missing tier between universal care and specialist referral, are exactly the pieces now being built by Worth-it and other Youth Coaching organisations. Schools that move on this now won't be taking a leap of faith on an unproven idea. They'll be adopting, early, what the evidence has been pointing to for over a decade.

Coaching offers a practical, empowering, and evidence-based way to build the resilience and wellbeing that protect young people's mental health. By investing in coaching and training the adults who support young people, we can increase our collective capacity to intervene early and effectively. Let's move beyond simply reacting to crises and start building a future where every young person has the skills and support they need to flourish.

To take the first step in empowering young people, access our Introduction to Coaching Young People Course, where you'll discover practical insights and strategies to start making a difference. If you're ready to deepen your skills and gain a professional edge, explore our Accredited Coach Training Course—a comprehensive program designed to help you transform your coaching practice. Learn more about the course and its benefits by downloading our detailed Coach Training Prospectus

Coaching in Education Academic Sources

Atad OI, Grant AM (2021), "Evidence-based coaching as a supplement to traditional lectures: impact on undergraduates' goal attainment and measures of mental well-being". International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, Vol. 10 No. 3 pp. 249–266, doi:

Bishop, L. (2017). A scoping review of mental health coaching. The Coaching Psychologist, 14(1).

Campbell, M. A., & Gardner, S. (2005). A pilot study to assess the effects of life coaching with Year 12 students. In M. Cavanagh, A. M. Grant, & T. Kemp (Eds.), Evidence based coaching: Volume 1. Theory, research and practice from the behavioural sciences (pp. 159–169). Australian Academic Press.

Campbell, A. L., & Mogashana, D. (2025). Assessing the effectiveness of academic coaching interventions for student success in higher education: A systematic review. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62(4), 1325–1347.

Fazel, P., Kovács, K. E., & Kovács, J. (2025). Coaching in higher education: a systematic review of coaching intervention on university students. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice.

Franco, M. P., Rouiller, S., Bradshaw, C. P., Pas, E. T., Pandey, T., Kaihoi, C. A., & Bottiani, J. H. (Accepted/In press). Coaching Teachers to Implement Equity and Social and Emotional Learning Focused Curricula in the Classroom: Insights from a Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2025.2596780

Green, L. S., Grant, A. M., & Rynsaardt, J. (2007). Evidence-based life coaching for senior high school students: Building hardiness and hope. International Coaching Psychology Review, 2(1), 24–32.

Green, L. S., Norrish, J. M., Vella-Brodrick, D. A., & Grant, A. M. (2013). Enhancing well-being and goal striving in senior high school students: Comparing evidence-based coaching and positive psychology interventions. Institute of Coaching, Breaking Research: Scientific Findings from Harnisch Grant Recipients.

Madden, W., Green, S., & Grant, A. M. (2011). A pilot study evaluating strengths-based coaching for primary school students: Enhancing engagement and hope. International Coaching Psychology Review, 6(1), 71–83.

Passmore, J., & Brown, A. (2009). Coaching non-adult students for enhanced examination performance: A longitudinal study. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Practice and Research, 2(1), 54–64.

Robson-Kelly, L., & van Nieuwerburgh, C. (2016). What does coaching have to offer to young people at risk of developing mental health problems? A grounded theory study. International Coaching Psychology Review, 11(1), 75–92.

Short, E., Kinman, G., & Baker, S. (2010). Evaluating the impact of a peer coaching intervention on well-being amongst psychology undergraduate students. International Coaching Psychology Review, 5(1), 27–35.

van Nieuwerburgh, C., & Barr, M. (2016). Coaching in education. In T. Bachkirova, G. Spence, & D. Drake (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of coaching. Sage.

van Nieuwerburgh, C., & Tong, C. (2013). Exploring the benefits of being a student coach in educational settings: A mixed-method study. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Practice and Research, 6(1), 5–24.

van Nieuwerburgh, C., Zacharia, C., Luckham, E., Prebble, G., & Browne, L. (2012). Coaching students in a secondary school: A case study. In C. van Nieuwerburgh (Ed.), Coaching in education: Getting better results for students, educators, and parents. Karnac.

Government and sector guidance

Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, & Department for Education. (n.d.). Developing your school or college targeted mental wellbeing support.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2022). Social, emotional and mental wellbeing in primary and secondary education: [G] Evidence review for targeted social and emotional support (NICE Guideline NG223).

Ofsted. (2026). State-funded school inspection toolkit.